Brief Display | Full Display

Yong Chen, Ling Chen, Liu Zhaojun, and Ru-Shan Wu
New fractal approach to the clustering of earthquakes; physical fractal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (February 1998), 88(1):89-94

Abstract:
Traditional fractal analysis methods of earthquake temporal clustering treat earthquake events as mathematical points (without mass) in time (Smalley et al., 1987). The results obtained by these methods mainly reflect the seismic behavior of numerous small earthquakes. A sieve method of physical fractal analysis has been developed in the present article in which a series of magnitude sieves are used to study the fractal behavior of earthquakes with different magnitudes. Fractal analyses of earthquake clustering are conducted for three regions: northern China, mainland of China, and southern California. We find that all the earthquake subsets of each region show nearly the same fractal dimension, D = 0.3 for northern China and the mainland of China and D = 0.4 for southern California. The scaling ranges in which the corresponding earthquake subsets under consideration exhibit fractal features vary from subset to subset. The method has the potential application to characterizing the fractal behavior of earthquake clustering for different regions.

Index Terms/Descriptors:
applications; Asia; California; China; cluster analysis; distribution; earthquakes; equations; Far East; fractals; magnitude; Southern California; statistical analysis; United States

Latitude & Longitude:
N32°30'00" - N42°00'00" and W124°30'00" - W114°15'00" (Search for maps and images at Alexandria Digital Library)
N20°00'00" - N53°00'00" and E74°00'00" - E135°00'00" (Search for maps and images at Alexandria Digital Library)

GeoRef, Copyright 2004, American Geological Institute.