Brief Display | Full Display

Gregory P. Van, Stephen K. Park, and Patrick Hamilton
Monitoring leaks from storage ponds using resistivity methods
Geophysics (August 1991), 56(8):1267-1270

Abstract:
Two common methods for detecting leaks from storage ponds are detection of contaminants in monitoring wells and use of two asphaltic liners with a seep collection system between them. However, significant quantities of the impounded fluid may have leaked by the time contaminants are detected in the wells. Double liners have the advantage that leaks are detected before the fluid escapes into the environment, but they are expensive. An alternative approach is to use electrical resistivity methods to detect leaks. Several studies have mapped conductive zones with electrical methods and have inferred the presence of contaminated groundwater (e.g., Greenhouse and Harris, 1983). A fundamental ambiguity in any such survey is that the subsurface may contain conductive sediments (such as clay or silt) that may be mistaken for contaminated water, however. Parra (1988) proposed an alternative method that detects holes in a liner by mapping the electrical response due to a short circuit across an insulating liner which results from conductive fluid in a hole. An important result is that the electrical response of the leak is detectable only within a few meters with this method.

Index Terms/Descriptors:
Clark County Nevada; electrical methods; geophysical methods; geophysical surveys; Laughlin Nevada; monitoring; Nevada; resistivity; seepage; storage ponds; surveys; three-dimensional models; United States; waste disposal

Latitude & Longitude:
N35°02'00" - N36°53'00" and W115°53'00" - W114°03'00" (Search for maps and images at Alexandria Digital Library)

GeoRef, Copyright 2005, American Geological Institute. Reference includes data supplied by Society of Exploration Geophysicists, Tulsa, OK, United States